Saturday, June 6, 2009

Comments on AC Secession LTE

Some seem to think that the South and Midwest (red states) only grow
cotton and have not changed since 1860. Don't they call the North the
"Rustbelt"? If the Conservative States of America (CSA) implemented
the Fair Tax, then our economy would grow quickly vs the welfare state
in the United Socialist States of America (USSA).
Why is the United States in the primary position of disaster relief?
Don't individuals have any responsibility? How about cities, counties
and states?
Secession is not treasonous. Read the 9th and 10th Amendments. The
SCOTUS told FDR that what he was doing was unconstitutional. He
and Lincoln both ignored the Constitution. Check the facts. The largest
Ponzi scheme in history is Social Security. The CSA would be better off
without it and Medicare/Medicaid and taxpayer support of ACORN.
The new SCOTCSA would not have justices like Breyer, Ginsburg,
Stevens, Souter or Sotomayor. The new Constitution of the CSA would
be very much like the current U.S. Constitution, but Amendments 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23 and 24 would not be included in their current form.
The bad case law - like Roe v Wade - based on these flawed
Amendments would be abandoned.
Immigration would be strongly enforced and the southern border
secured.
We would seek membership in the United Nations, but at the
minimum dues - not 22% of the UN budget.
The CSA would be reimbursed for any monies paid to the USSA
for the support of its citizens - FICA - and any monies diverted by the
USSA for our portion of bailouts of failed USSA entities - Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, GM, AIG, etc.

2 comments:

  1. I would be fascinated to learn how you would rewrite the 15th and 24th amendments to the Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The 15th Amendment would be unnecessary since all
    citizens at least 21 years old would be eligible to vote. The 24th adds "or other tax." Voters
    should be those with a vested interest (own property and pay taxes). Otherwise, we will continue to rush headlong to a welfare state if 50.1% or more contribute nothing but receive much.

    ReplyDelete